AAT Bioquest社 Cell Transfection Efficiency: Lipofectamine or Transfectamine?
この製品に関するご意見・ご照会・お問合せはこちら
|
Cell Transfection:
Lipofectamine™ vs. Transfectamine™
Physical transfection methods such as electroporation or microinjection tend to have low efficiency and damage cells.
Chemical-based transfection uses materials ranging from inexpensive calcium phosphate and organic dendrimers to advanced ones like Lipofectamine™ and Transfectamine™, but which must be optimized. There are 2 key issues with transfection: • Chronically low efficiency • Cytotoxicity associated with the transfection procedure. Through rigorous in-house testing, we have successfully shown that cells transfected with Transfectamine™ 5000 provides much higher transfection efficiency with low cytotoxicity, as compared with similar reagents.
|
Comparison of Transfection Efficiency: CHO-K1 cells were cultured to ~90% confluency. GFP plasmid was transfected with Lipofectamine™ 2000, Lipofectamine™ 3000 and Transfectamine™ 5000. Images taken 24 hours post transfection with fluorescent microscope in FITC channel.
Click For More About |
|
Fount of Information は、新商品、新規取扱メーカーなどの情報をいち早く紹介するコンテンツです。情報発信のスピードを重視しているコンテンツのため、現時点で法規制や取り扱いを確認できていない商品、定価を設定できていない商品があります。ご要望やご照会を受けた商品について、法令整備や在庫の充実を図ります。